Lenese Herbert

Professor of Law

J.D., University of California, Los Angeles


Intent upon infusing her law students with an appreciation for Houstonian lawyering in a post-Thurgood Marshall world.

Professor Herbert has taught at Howard since 2008, thrice as a visitor and, as of 2013, as a full-time tenured professor. She teaches courses in criminal law, criminal procedure, evidence, admin law, and social media and the law.

Considered an expert on bias in the criminal justice system, (im)proper policing, and the role of a criminal prosecutor, Herbert’s scholarship is published in a number of law reviews and journals; it is also cited in court decisions and pleadings, including amicus briefs filed in the recent U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court’s GPS tracking decision. Herbert has also co-authored two volumes, Constitutional Criminal Procedure (with the late Howard Law professor Andrew Taslitz and Margie Paris) and Lexis Nexis Skills and Values: Criminal Law (with Taslitz and Tinto).

Her newest solo effort, 2016 Supplement to Taslitz, Paris, and Herbert’s Constitutional Criminal Procedure (University Casebook Series 2016), is now in bookstores. On Twitter, she can be found @HowNow,Herbert? heavily Re-Tweeting links and other content related to criminal justice, policing, and SCOTUS.

2016 Supplement to Taslitz, Paris, and Herbert’s Constitutional Criminal Procedure (University Casebook Series 2016) ISBN-13: 9781683283010

Washington Post article on implicit bias training, August 16, 2016

Recently Published

Constitutional Criminal Procedure (5th ed. with Taslitz & Paris, 2014)
Skills and Values: Criminal Law (with Taslitz & Tinto, LexisNexis, 2014)

Presently Relevant

Policing, Protestors, and Discretion: Why Properly Policing a Protest Matters, Fordham Urban Law Journal (2013)
How Occupy’s Race-Based Privilege May Improve Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence for All, Seattle U. Law Review (2012)
Bete Noire: How Race-Based Policing Threatens National Security, Michigan Journal of Race and Law (Vol. IX, 2003)