Brown@50 Home
Index to Cases
Chronology
Biographies
Resources

 

This Brown@50 site provides special value for cases in three main respects:  (1) the cases collected here all relate to Brown in some fashion, (2) there are links to the biographies of the lead attorneys in Brown from the relevant cases, and (3) it is free. Links to the cases are found in the Index to Cases and the Chronology.  The cases are available on the Brown@50 website in either html or pdf formats or in a few instances both.  More sophisticated markups of the cases with crosslinking to other cases fotnoes and the like are available from solely commercial vendors like Westlaw and Lexis, and from Findlaw which has both commercial parts and free parts, and from Cornell's Legal Information Institute which is a free site. Official versions of the more recent cases can often be found at the particular court's website such as the U.S. Supreme Court, or other U.S. federal courts.


Supreme Court of the United States

Sipuel

v.

Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

No. 369.
Argued Jan. 7, 8, 1948.
Decided Jan. 12, 1948.

332 U.S. 631

Messrs. Thurgood Marshall, of New York City, and Amos Hall, of Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

Messrs. Fred Hansen, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Maurice H. Merrill, of Norman, Okl., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

On January 14, 1946, the petitioner, a Negro, concededly qualified to receive the professional legal education offered by the State, applied for admission to the School of Law of the University of Oklahoma, the only institution for legal education supported and maintained by the taxpayers of the State of Oklahoma. Petitioner's application for admission was denied, solely because of her color.

Petitioner then made application for a writ of mandamus in the District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma. The writ of mandamus was refused, and the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma affirmed the judgment of the District Court. Okl. Sup., 180 P.2d 135. We brought the case here for review.

The petitioner is entitled to secure legal education afforded by a state institution. To this time, it has been denied her although during the same period many [332 U.S. 631 , 633]  white applicants have been afforded legal education by the State. The State must provide it for her in conformity with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and provide it as soon as it does for applicants of any other group. State of Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 1938, 305 U.S. 337 .

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Reversed.